Are laws of nature actually "laws"?

Quick thought ...

Credit: Wikimedia Commons.
Perhaps there are no laws "of" nature. Perhaps what we call "laws" or "relations/universalities" (to use more appropriate philosophical terms) are but mere descriptions of the universe ITSELF, just like descriptions of matter and energy.

In other words, could it be that it is an ESSENTIAL property of objects (including matter/energy/dark matter/dark energy etc.) to behave this way? Could it be that "laws" or "universalities" are but mere mental constructs? If this was indeed the case, the question "Why is gravity attractive and not repulsive?" is purely scientific and not metaphysical. It would be conceivable that other universes exist whereby matter has essential properties different from our universe's. In this sense, the questions "What is matter?" and "What laws govern matter?" would be essentially equivalent.

Let us ask ourselves the question in a different way: what if the nuclear forces were any different, such that nuclei could never form. You may say that a fundamental "law of nature" has changed. Is it not true that a change in the "law of nature" resulted in a fundamentally different void of "matter"? It may be argued, therefore, that the initial change was in the fundamental properties of nature ITSELF, and not to anything external to it. The laws of nature, in this view, ARE nature. Nature is not independent of its laws; the laws are mere descriptions of nature.

This perspective may seem trivial or perhaps even useless to some. Perhaps it is. Nonetheless, the idea that "finding a new species" and "discovering a new law of nature" are both equivalent (in terms of philosophical bearing, not practical value) is –in my opinion- a profound one.

Cheers!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Critical thinking: a primer

Image
Ever failed to organize an argument or support your point of view? Ever wondered why some people are very persuasive even when they defend an incorrect point of view? Ever been unable to form a full picture about a situation because of the difficult decisions involved?! If so then you need to train yourself to think critically. Critical thinking is not necessarily about “criticism” as the name might suggest. It is about the way in which one analyses situations, argues own opinion, assesses evidence, presents own thoughts and handles difficult decisions. Someone with good critical thinking skills will be able to take a leading role and handle stress with mastery. A critical thinker is objective in perspective, democratic in nature towards other opinions and has a clear long-term objective. Someone with fine critical thinking skills is positive, dynamic and is educated. A critical thinker makes use of knowledge gained in any discipline to handle a seemingly-irrelevant s
Read more

Reductionism can be a spiritual experience

Image
Hello! Credit: Wikimedia Commons . Have you ever thought of (and I mean,  really contemplated) your blood as a solution? Have you ever thought of your cells as a solvent containing dissolved electrolytes and solutes. i.e. as a lipid containers with a jelly protoplasm and a fine meshwork of actin polymers to hold them together? Have you ever thought of your limbs as mere layers of proteins and lipid, organized in various mixes and shapes to form the muscles you move with and the skin that covers them? Have you ever, at your deepest moment of emotionality, looked back and contemplated how your pounding heart is a mere pump? Have you ever thought of your thorax and abdomen as containing a cavity? Have you TRULY ever tried to imagine that the food that passes your pharynx still has a long way to go down a muscular tube? Have you ever thought of your hormones, transduction cascades, DNA replication, protein synthesis and cellular movement as chemical reactions?
Read more

The exotoxin mystery

Image
Hello there, Recently I've been preoccupied with the following question: Why do human bacteria produce exotoxins?! After all, if they are lingering happily with the nutrients at the site of infection, why harm the organism that harbors them?! Credit: Wikimedia Commons . What struck me even more is that I haven't asked such a simple and rather primitive question earlier! why do bacteria produce exotoxins? " did not do so because they subconsciously think that "bacteria are bad, so it's natural that they harm us!" . And after a moment of thought, I started to realize that this stems from our human tendency to polarize things and to take things to the extremes, being content with the simplest explanations that satisfy our child-like brains. People are either good or bad! This all-or-none mentality has been engraved into us from our early childhood, as a natural biological safety measure. As children, many of us saw our parents as the ultim
Read more